| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 257 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Pegasus Assets Reconstruction (P) Ltd. vs Haryana Concast Ltd. and Anr.
Sale of secured asset-SARFAESI Act 2002 a complete code, Nothing lacking therein so as to borrow anything from the Companies Act 1956-Whether a company court, directly or through an official liquidator, could wield any control in respect of sale of a secured asset by a secured credit [LexDoc Id : 492712]
|
SC |
2015 |
Central Bank of India vs Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. and Ors.
Bank loan: Liability of guarantor-Respondents personally liable after date of execution of letter of guarantee, Appeal dismissed-Whether the concurrent findings of trial court as well as the high court absolving the respondents, other than the first respondent, of a total amount [LexDoc Id : 492709]
|
SC |
2015 |
Canara Bank v Kaybee Safal (India) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 491995]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
KMS Cargo Services vs Sky 2C Freight Systems India (P) Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 492524]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Apex Electronics and Ors. vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 491988]
|
DRAT (Delhi) |
2015 |
Development Credit Bank Ltd. vs Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi and Ors.
Rejection of appeal: Appellate tribunal not empowered to condone delay beyond the statutory period-Appeal not filed within the prescribed time, Petition dismissed-Whether the first respondent was justified in rejecting the appeal of petitioners on the ground that it was barred by limitation or whether the first [LexDoc Id : 492519]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Anjali Kukar vs M.M. Lal Chhabra
Dishonour of cheque: Dismissal of complaint by trial court-Defence raised by respondent not probable, Acquittal order set aside-Whether the trial court was justified in dismissing the complaint filed under the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 and acquitting the respondent findin [LexDoc Id : 492517]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Punjab National Bank and Ors. vs Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. and Ors.
Right of representation-Section 30 of the Advocates Act, 1961. Right of advocates to practise-The appellant Punjab National Bank (PNB) proposed to so classify the respondents i.e. Kingfisher Airlines Limited, United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd. an [LexDoc Id : 492073]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Reserve Bank of India, ICICI Bank Ltd. and Ors. vs Jayantilal N. Mistry and Ors.
Applications seeking certain information of other banks in public interest-Right to information regarding functioning of public institutions a fundamental right enshrined in article 19-Whether all the information sought for under the Right to Information Act 2005 could be denied by the appellant and other banks to the public at large [LexDoc Id : 493297]
|
SC |
2015 |
Narayana Farm Produce (P) Ltd. and Ors. vs Bank of Maharashtra
Challenge to pre-deposit order and section 18(1) of SARFAESI Act 2002-Making of pre-deposit mandatory even while filing appeals against interlocutory orders, Petition dismissed-Whether the challenge of petitioners to the provisions of section 18(1) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement o [LexDoc Id : 492076]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
N. Vanjimuthu vs Competent Authority and Commissioner of Land Administration, DRO and Ors.
Attachment of properties-Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act, 1997. Default of return of deposits-The Respondent 2 collected deposits from number of persons. In spite of the deposits got matured, the depositors were not returned with money. Acting [LexDoc Id : 492075]
|
HC (Chennai) |
2015 |
Malayan Banking Berhad (Maybank) vs Kuldeep Jindal and Ors.
Restraint on releasing letter of credit-Maintainability of injunction-The plaintiffs had placed order for certain goods with defendant and to honour the commitment, he opened letter of credit with State Bank of India. Th [LexDoc Id : 492074]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
GSL India Ltd. vs Asset. Reconstruction Co. India Ltd. and Ors.
Jurisdiction of DRT to entertain a securitisation application-DRT to be guided by the principles enshrined in section 19(1) of the RDB Act 1993-Whether the jurisdiction of debts recovery tribunal (DRT) for entertaining a securitisation application under section 17 of the of the Securitisation [LexDoc Id : 492072]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Abhijit Chakraborty vs State of West Bengal and Ors.
Power to examine the accused: Issuance of warrant of arrest-Order to appear as and when called to do so flouted, Petitioner not entitled to claim exemption from appearance-Whether the order of magistrate issuing a warrant of arrest against the petitioner without considering earlier order of exemption of personal appearan [LexDoc Id : 492068]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Rajpal vs State of Haryana
Conviction under NDPS Act 1985: Appellant found in conscious possession of poppy husk-Sentence order modified in view of antecedents of appellant, Appeal dismissed-Whether the order holding the appellant guilty and convicting for the offence punishable under section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Subst [LexDoc Id : 492078]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2015 |
Amin Warehousing and Ors. vs Al Freight International (P) Ltd. and Ors.
Dishonour of cheque: Appeal against acquittal order-Perverse findings of magistrate, Case established against accused, Appeal allowed-Whether the order of acquittal of accused and limiting their prosecution only with respect to five cheques on the ground that so far as other three ch [LexDoc Id : 492069]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Sajal Guha vs Maniklal Ghosh
[LexDoc Id : 491859]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
Adani Agri Fresh Ltd. vs Mahaboob Sharif and Ors.
Invocation of injunction of three bank guarantees by courts below-Concerned bank guarantees clearly unconditional, Bank directed to honour the same forthwith-Whether invocation of injunction of three bank guarantees not only by the trial court, but also by the appellate court, and the same was thereafter ma [LexDoc Id : 493271]
|
SC |
2015 |
Vivek Pandey vs State of Bihar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 491863]
|
HC (Patna) |
2015 |
Carrara Marbles and Granite Industries vs Simplex Enterprises
[LexDoc Id : 491855]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2015 |
Bridgestone India (P) Ltd. vs Inderpal Singh
[LexDoc Id : 491123]
|
SC |
2015 |
Sajid Ali and Ors. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 491081]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2015 |
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Vibhavari R. Fadte and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 491114]
|
HC (Bombay) |
2015 |
Manjoor Service Co-op Bank Ltd. vs Tahsildar and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 491079]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2015 |
Arya Bhandar (P) Ltd. vs Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Remand of original application: One time settlement-New proposal and/or offer mooted out in contradiction to earlier offer, Impugned order upheld-Whether the order remanding the original application to be considered afresh after setting aside the order passed by the tribunal allowing an applicat [LexDoc Id : 491073]
|
HC (Calcutta) |
2015 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
